District Court Declares Vacatur (Likely) Unconstitutional
By Josh Blackman · Sep 30, 2026, 11:47 AM CDT
Judge Kathryn Mizelle of the Middle District of Florida issued an opinion finding that the "set aside" remedy under the APA is (likely) unconstitutional. Here is an excerpt from the opinion: Even if Congress were to enact a law clearly empowering Article III courts to vacate agency rules or regulations and automatically cause their erasure from the Code of Federal Regulations, vacatur would likely
Excerpt shown under fair-use limits. Full text remains with the original publisher.
People in this coverage
Explore their history and attributable record. Being mentioned does not imply endorsement.
Layer 1 · Claims & fact checks
AI analysisLayer 3 · Reporting analysis
AI analysisSpeculative AttributionThe author attributes motivations and preferences to Supreme Court justices without citing any statements or sources, which serves to dramatize the issue.
Emotive LanguageThe language emphasizes constitutional infirmities, framing vacatur as a serious overreach, which may influence reader perception.
Appeal to AuthorityThe author positions the judge's opinion as pioneering, suggesting authority while acknowledging lack of precedent.
Context
AI analysisMissing context
The article does not provide the case name, docket number, or the specific legal question before the district court, nor does it explain the broader legal landscape of APA vacatur jurisprudence or prior appellate decisions on the issue.
Important context
Vacatur under the APA is a longstanding judicial remedy, and its constitutionality has been debated in prior cases. The district court's opinion is only one district-level view and has not yet been reviewed by an appellate court.
Opinion vs. reporting
AI analysisThe piece mixes reporting of the judge's opinion with speculative commentary about Supreme Court justices, blurring the line between factual reporting and opinion.