O2 signs record £200 million deal to retain naming rights for London venueSatirical tapestry depicting Robert Jenrick displayed at Conservative Party conferenceTeenagers launch Devon project recruiting children to breed harvest mice for releaseFormer Bishop of Broome Sentenced to Prison for Sexual Abuse of Aboriginal MenNaval drone reportedly strikes Liberian‑flagged oil tanker near Sochi, causing fire and smokeFirst Iowa gubernatorial debate held amid accusations and cultural‑war attacksIndonesia Constitutional Court dismisses challenge to Vice President Gibran Rakabuming Raka's eligibilityHouthis launch missiles at Aden airport amid Israel's October 7 anniversaryICE arrests man in Georgia while CBS News reporter rides alongFriends of Nolan Wells file defamation lawsuit against Terrell OwensHunter Valley community group wins Australia's first High Court climate change case over Mount Pleasant coal mineSyrian embassy in Berlin returns passport seized 43 years agoComedian Dave Hughes says he will stop appearing at Victorian Liberal Party events over donation law concernsHaiti Indefinitely Postpones Scheduled Elections Amid Ongoing Gang ViolenceIsraeli society moves further right three years after Oct 7 attacks
Back to event

I Want It All

By Eugene Volokh · Oct 5, 2026, 11:52 AM CDT

Read full article at Reason
Occasionally, I hear people make arguments in favor of constitutional rights claims by arguing that the Constitution was set up to protect liberty. And it most certainly was—in part. But I think that it's a mistake to treat this as a goal above all others, as the Preamble to the Constitution itself reflects (and of course the specific provisions within the text of the Constitution and the Amendmen

Excerpt shown under fair-use limits. Full text remains with the original publisher.

People in this coverage

Explore their history and attributable record. Being mentioned does not imply endorsement.

Layer 1 · Claims & fact checks

AI analysis

Layer 2 · Biblical perspective

Biblical interpretation
INSUFFICIENT CONTEXT
Read the biblical analysis

Layer 3 · Reporting analysis

AI analysis

Appeal to AuthorityThe author cites the Preamble to lend constitutional authority to the claim that multiple goals are intended and should be pursued together.

Balancing Act FramingThe author frames constitutional goals as inherently in tension, positioning the argument as a nuanced balancing of competing interests.

Future‑Oriented SpeculationThe author acknowledges uncertainty and invites alternative proposals, a rhetorical move that softens the assertiveness of the stance.

Context

AI analysis

Missing context

The article does not reference scholarly constitutional interpretation, historical debates about the purpose of the Preamble, or empirical studies that examine the relationship between liberty, economic growth, and national defense.

Important context

The piece is an opinion editorial, not a scholarly analysis, and reflects the author's personal interpretation of constitutional goals. It references the text of the Preamble as the primary basis for its argument.

Opinion vs. reporting

AI analysis

The article is primarily opinion; it presents the author's interpretation and preferences regarding constitutional goals rather than reporting verifiable news events or data.