The Other Sides of Sin CityArticle examines magical settings in Susanna Clarke's worksPresident Donald J. Trump Announces Medicare Improvement Fund Payments for SeniorsTrump officials reportedly hold secret Camp David meeting on Iran and Yemen conflictsKarl Rove warns Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton could lose Senate bid without debateDominican Republic bans Haiti from its stadiums after fan clashFilm 'Atonement' portrays alleged Marine incident during early Iraq WarSevere Flooding Hits Bangkok, 40 Dead as Disaster Declared Across All DistrictsFormer Mets GM Steve Phillips talks ALDS and NLDS on The TakeoutCo-creator of "The Amazing Race" discusses upcoming season on Daily ReportRep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez removes “Zyn” branding from campaign merchandise after request from parent companyStray Kids join BTS in Grammy Awards boycott over new “Best Asian Pop” categoryStudy suggests Chinese AI model Qwen may give government‑aligned answers on controversial topicsSen. Ted Cruz discusses NIL legislation, Texas politics, and Trump's approval rating in interviewVehicle crashes into crowd of fans awaiting Knights team bus in Newcastle, several injured
Back to event

Someone got Doom in an SQL database

By Kyle Orland · Oct 2, 2026, 4:19 PM CDT

Read full article at Ars Technica
"Rendering Doom in a database is obviously a bad idea," Lukas Vogel writes in a lengthy blog post explaining how exactly he managed to render Doom using an SQL database. OK, that's not entirely accurate. The SQLDoom project uses a small Python client to handle input and output, drive the game's timing, and display each frame to the screen. Behind that, a series of CedarDB tables tracks the game ge

Excerpt shown under fair-use limits. Full text remains with the original publisher.

People in this coverage

Explore their history and attributable record. Being mentioned does not imply endorsement.

Layer 1 · Claims & fact checks

AI analysis

Layer 2 · Biblical perspective

Biblical interpretation
INSUFFICIENT CONTEXT
Read the biblical analysis

Layer 3 · Reporting analysis

AI analysis

Headline framingThe headline uses sensational phrasing that overstates the role of the database, setting up a perception that the entire game runs inside SQL.

Contrast statementThe quote frames the project as counter‑intuitive, priming readers to view the technical work as a novelty rather than a serious engineering effort.

Clarifying correctionThe article explicitly corrects the headline’s implication, providing a more nuanced description of the system architecture.

Comparative framingBy comparing to the original Doom graphics, the text emphasizes visual fidelity, enhancing the perceived achievement.

Context

AI analysis

Missing context

The article does not explain performance metrics (e.g., frame rate stability, latency) compared to native Doom implementations, nor does it discuss the practical usefulness or limitations of running game logic in SQL beyond the novelty factor.

Important context

Understanding that the database stores only geometry and logic while a separate Python client handles real‑time interaction is crucial for accurately interpreting the project's technical achievement.

Opinion vs. reporting

AI analysis

The piece mixes factual reporting (description of architecture, code size, frame resolution) with opinionated language, such as calling the earlier DoomQL project "more akin to the simplistic 90‑degree‑angled maps of Wolfenstein 3D" and labeling the headline claim as "obviously a bad idea."