Prominent Pearly King George Major Passes AwayStudy finds cost of living tops Germans' fears in 2026Footage shows Christa Pike during murder trials in 1996 and 2012Germany praises Montenegro's EU progress amid concerns over translation readinessDutch cattle farmers explore rice cultivation as response to warming climate and peatland degradationGreek Prime Minister urges EU to relax fiscal rules amid rising energy costsDanny Boyle cites Jack O'Connell as his preferred choice for the next James BondShakira to livestream Madrid concert worldwide via Amazon Music, Prime Video and TwitchFrance unveils 2027 budget proposing public‑sector wage freeze, pension cuts and new taxesHassan Hajjaj’s “Rock Stars” Portraits Featuring Global Music Icons on Display at Paris PhilharmonieGarry Kasparov says U.S. warned him of threat to his lifeCéline Dion launches 16‑day French residency with AI‑enhanced sound systemUK and France terminate Channel migrant exchange agreementParis Curie Institute Develops ‘Tumor‑on‑a‑Chip’ Models Amid Breast Cancer Awareness CampaignFrench Parliament to Debate Bill Strengthening Protections Against Gender‑Based Violence
Back to event

Technology has posed threats before. AI can be managed, too, historian says.

By Laina Gustafson · Sep 17, 2026, 3:27 PM CDT

Read full article at The Christian Science Monitor
Margaret O’Mara has studied similar points in American history and says that the pace of artificial intelligence growth and the technology’s risks do not have to be overwhelming.

Excerpt shown under fair-use limits. Full text remains with the original publisher.

People in this coverage

Explore their history and attributable record. Being mentioned does not imply endorsement.

Layer 1 · Claims & fact checks

AI analysis

Layer 2 · Biblical perspective

Biblical interpretation
INSUFFICIENT CONTEXT
Read the biblical analysis

Layer 3 · Reporting analysis

AI analysis

Appeal to AuthorityThe author invokes O’Mara’s scholarly background to lend credibility to the claim that AI risks can be managed.

Optimistic FramingThe language downplays potential dangers, framing AI as a manageable challenge.

Context

AI analysis

Missing context

The piece provides no concrete examples of past technological threats, no data on AI development speed, no discussion of specific risks, and no counter‑arguments from other experts or stakeholders.

Important context

The claim is situated within ongoing public debate about AI safety, regulation, and historical analogies to previous disruptive technologies.

Opinion vs. reporting

AI analysis

The article blends reporting with opinion, presenting O’Mara’s perspective without independent verification or balanced viewpoints.