California couple arrested in connection with surrogacy controversyRonaldo apologizes for Portugal walkout, cites broken promises by coach Jorge JesusOlympian accused of damaging Reflecting Pool requests IG investigation into arrest and case dismissalNew entrants emerge in the space sectorABC seeks court order to halt FCC's early license reviewFormer CIA official linked to alleged $200 million diversion scheme involving gold bars and Florida propertiesNewly released body‑cam footage of arrests in Arizona fuels backlash over police use of forceGold‑coated statue of Donald Trump displayed in StrasbourgWhistleblower Complaint Claims Trump Directed FBI Probe of Los Angeles Anti‑ICE ProtestersAnesthesiologist warns Christa Pike's lawyers execution could be painfulReed Brody Highlights Systemic Issues Following Botched Execution of Christa PikeTuareg rebels withdraw from Kidal amid reported air strikesTensions rise in Israel ahead of October 7Court hears alleged Iranian spies surveilled UK journalists in alleged plan for serious violenceResidents of Yemen's Taiz Express Concern Over Potential Food and Fuel Shortages Amid Ongoing Fighting
Back to event

The New Dark Ages Is Long on Alarm, Short on Scientific Literacy

By Chris Ferguson · Oct 6, 2026, 7:00 AM CDT

Read full article at Reason
The New Dark Ages: The Death of Reading and the Dawn of the Post-Literate Society , by James Marriott, Doubleday, 208 pages, $26 The last few years have seen a glut of sky-is-falling books about kids. Jonathan Haidt's The Anxious Generation has made a generation of parents anxious. Jared Horvath's The Digital Delusion has fueled a backlash against technology in schools. The latest, James Marriott'

Excerpt shown under fair-use limits. Full text remains with the original publisher.

People in this coverage

Explore their history and attributable record. Being mentioned does not imply endorsement.

Layer 1 · Claims & fact checks

AI analysis

Layer 2 · Biblical perspective

Biblical interpretation
INSUFFICIENT CONTEXT
Read the biblical analysis

Layer 3 · Reporting analysis

AI analysis

Appeal to FearThe author frames declining literacy as an existential threat to democracy to evoke anxiety.

Anecdotal EvidenceThe article highlights the use of isolated anecdotes rather than systematic data.

StrawmanThe author attributes a simplistic causal claim to Marriott without showing Marriott actually made that direct implication.

Appeal to AuthorityCiting a researcher to bolster the counter‑argument, though no study is provided.

Contrast with Positive TrendsThe author juxtaposes negative claims with broad positive statistics to undermine the book’s thesis.

Context

AI analysis

Missing context

The article does not provide comprehensive data from peer‑reviewed research on screen time and reading outcomes, nor does it present longitudinal studies that examine causality. It omits discussion of methodological limitations in the cited CDC trends, the full range of NAEP score fluctuations, and broader socioeconomic factors influencing both screen use and academic performance.

Important context

A balanced assessment would need to reference systematic reviews of screen time effects, detailed NAEP trend analyses, and peer‑reviewed studies on youth mental health and literacy. Context about how reading habits have changed across media (print vs. digital) and the role of educational policy would also be relevant.

Opinion vs. reporting

AI analysis

The piece is predominantly opinionated, offering evaluative language (“alarmist,” “lofty moral lectures,” “trite narrative”) and personal judgments rather than systematic reporting of evidence.