ATO reports 25% of large Australian firms paid no tax as credit‑card surcharges are eliminatedRep. Madeleine Dean Calls for Federal AI Oversight and Criticizes Trump’s Iran PolicyFederal judge approves settlement clearing Paramount's takeover of Warner Bros. DiscoveryLandslides and heavy rain kill around 30 in Nepal after recent floodsResearch proposes Chicxulub impact could have fostered hydrothermal habitatsFifth measles death reported among unvaccinated individuals in PennsylvaniaIran’s Revolutionary Guard Calls on Americans to Vote Against Trump Ahead of MidtermsAdvocacy Groups Urge Congress to Investigate Tech Platform ScamsTrump Announces South Korea May Invest Up to $200 Billion in U.S. Energy ProjectsSen. Rand Paul blocks unanimous consent for Kids Online Safety ActImmigration advocate sues U.S. government over alleged warrantless phone search at borderSenators Katie Britt and Maxwell Frost named to Time100 Next listUS Consumer Spending and PCE Inflation Show Mixed Signals in AugustTrump says he raised Hong Kong businessman Jimmy Lai's case with XiFlow Engineering secures $750M valuation with backing from Valor, Atreides, Sequoia and angel Roelof Botha
Back to event

Trump leans on SCOTUS shadow docket more than Biden, Obama and Bush combined

By Josephine Walker · Sep 29, 2026, 2:55 PM CDT

Read full article at Axios
President Trump's administration on Monday filed its 41st application to the Supreme Court's shadow docket , a milestone that matches the total number of petitions it filed during his entire first term — in less than two years. Why it matters: The record highlights how often the president has turned to SCOTUS to secure authority to temporarily revive policies blocked by lower courts. What they're

Excerpt shown under fair-use limits. Full text remains with the original publisher.

People in this coverage

Explore their history and attributable record. Being mentioned does not imply endorsement.

Layer 1 · Claims & fact checks

AI analysis

Layer 2 · Biblical perspective

Biblical interpretation
INSUFFICIENT CONTEXT
Read the biblical analysis

Layer 3 · Reporting analysis

AI analysis

Appeal to AuthorityUses Spaulding’s position at a respected legal institute to lend credibility to the claim about unprecedented usage.

Emotive LanguageFrames the court’s actions as potentially improper, invoking doubt without presenting concrete evidence.

Partisan FramingPositions the administration as a victim of activist judges, aligning with a partisan narrative.

Statistical ComparisonPresents raw numbers to support the headline claim, but lacks context about case volume or success rates.

Context

AI analysis

Missing context

The article does not provide comparative data on the total number of cases each administration faced, the success rate of the emergency applications, or independent analysis of whether the applications were justified under Supreme Court standards.

Important context

Understanding the shadow docket’s purpose, its typical usage rates across administrations, and the legal standards for granting emergency relief is essential to evaluate claims about overuse or abuse.

Opinion vs. reporting

AI analysis

The piece mixes factual reporting (numbers of applications) with opinionated commentary from quoted sources, using their statements to frame the narrative rather than presenting independent analysis.