We can’t help treating AI like it’s human. But should we?
By Amanda Silberling · Oct 9, 2026, 11:40 AM CDT
"When we are drawn into even the most primitive exchanges with a relational artifact, we believe it cares for us," Dr. Sherry Turkle writes. "And we are wired to care for it in return."
Excerpt shown under fair-use limits. Full text remains with the original publisher.
People in this coverage
Explore their history and attributable record. Being mentioned does not imply endorsement.
Layer 1 · Claims & fact checks
AI analysisLayer 3 · Reporting analysis
AI analysisQuotationThe article relies entirely on a direct quote to convey its message, using the authority of an academic to frame the argument.
FramingThe language frames human interaction with AI as inherently relational, implying an emotional bias that may influence how AI is treated.
Appeal to AuthorityCiting a recognized scholar serves to lend credibility to the claim without providing supporting evidence or data.
Context
AI analysisMissing context
The article provides no background on Dr. Turkle’s expertise, no data on how widespread this behavior is, and no discussion of specific AI systems or contexts where anthropomorphizing AI might have practical consequences.
Important context
The quotation touches on a broader scholarly discussion about human‑computer interaction and the ethical implications of attributing human qualities to AI, a topic explored in fields such as psychology, technology studies, and AI ethics.
Opinion vs. reporting
AI analysisThe text is an opinion piece; it presents a single expert’s perspective without additional reporting, data, or multiple viewpoints.