Fact check
“Sheridan was found to have abused his authority over MCSO’s internal affairs process by obstructing and manipulating misconduct investigations and disciplinary proceedings.”
Reasoning
The claim matches the language in the two excerpts, which quote a district judge’s findings that Sheridan abused his authority to obstruct and manipulate misconduct investigations and disciplinary proceedings. No contradictory evidence is presented.
On confidence: Both provided excerpts from a reputable news outlet (ProPublica) directly state that Sheridan was found to have abused his authority over MCSO’s internal affairs process by obstructing and manipulating investigations.
Important context
The statements come from a ProPublica article reporting on a judge's ruling regarding oversight of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, indicating a legal finding rather than mere allegation.
Evidence
Supporting (2)
- Tier 1 — Primary sourceJudge Denies Efforts to End Oversight of Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office — ProPublica
District Judge G. Murray Snow stressed Sheriff Jerry Sheridan’s role in the department’s racial profiling since the start of the case more than a decade ago, including fighting court-ordered reforms and stymieing investigations. Sheridan…
- Tier 1 — Primary sourceJudge Denies Efforts to End Oversight of Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office — ProPublica
department’s racial profiling since the start of the case more than a decade ago, including fighting court-ordered reforms and stymieing investigations. Sheridan was the No. 2 under former Sheriff Joe Arpaio when the county was found out…
Limitations
The evidence is limited to the two excerpts; the full article or court documents are not provided, so verification is based solely on the quoted material.
- Last verified:
- Sep 27, 2026, 4:43 AM CDT
- Pipeline:
- 2.1.0
- Claim type:
- Factual
Where this claim appeared
Judge Denies Efforts to End Oversight of Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office as Racial Profiling of Latinos PersistsProPublica · Yana Kunichoff