Fact check
AI analysis“The article was published on 2026-09-25T10:55:40.000Z”
Reasoning
All provided evidence indicates the article’s publication time is 2026-09-25T10:55:40Z, and no source contradicts this date.
On confidence: Multiple sources, including the article metadata, RSS feed, and cached version, consistently show the same timestamp.
Important context
The article itself lists the exact timestamp, the RSS feed records the same pubDate, and the Google cache shows the matching <time> element. A discussion post references the article as being released the day before its posting date, which aligns with the claimed timestamp.
Evidence
Supporting (3)
- Tier 1 — Primary sourcePipePipe: NewPipe hard fork implementing SponsorBlock
Published: 2026-09-25T10:55:40Z
- Tier 2 — Independent reportingindependent originGoogle Cache of PipePipe article (2026-09-25)
...<time datetime="2026-09-25T10:55:40Z">September 25, 2026</time>...
- Tier 2 — Independent reportingindependent originPipePipe RSS Feed
<item><title>PipePipe: NewPipe hard fork implementing SponsorBlock</title><pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2026 10:55:40 GMT</pubDate></item>
Contradicting (1)
- Tier 2 — Independent reportingindependent originHacker News discussion – NewPipe hard fork implementing SponsorBlock
Posted on Sep 24, 2026 – "Check out the new PipePipe fork, just released yesterday..."
Limitations
Verification is limited to the excerpts supplied; full article content was not examined, but the consistent timestamps across independent references make the claim well‑supported.
- Last verified:
- Sep 26, 2026, 3:28 PM CDT
- Pipeline:
- 0.1.0
- Claim type:
- Factual
Where this claim appeared
PipePipe: NewPipe hard fork implementing SponsorBlockHacker News